GOOD HEAVENS, THEY KNOW REN FU COLLECTION’S BLACK-LIST OF FAKE ZISHA HUS IS COMING AND WILL EXPOSE THEIR FAKE ZISHA HUS SO THEY ARE IN A HURRY TO SELL THEIR FAKE CHEN MING YUAN POTS………………………
When Liu Chuan Sin bought the fake Chen Ming Yuan Pumpkin-shaped Pot(belonging to K.S.Lo) on the 1st of June 2011 at Christie’s auction Hong Kong, he later quickly sold it to make money while the publicity was still hot, so to speak, because he thought people will slowly start to think and compare to Ren Fu Collection’s excavated Chen Ming Yuan Pots with archaeological records.
That was the reason for Liu Chuan Sin, the notorious forger and seller of fake Zhang DaQian paintings, to quickly sell the fake Chen Ming Yuan Pot after Ren Fu Collection started to show its pre-Daoguang Chen Ming Yuan Pots especially the Early Kangxi Chen Ming Yuan Pot No:249 because people will slowly get to know and compare with Ren Fu Collection’s Pots.
But Good Heavens, now in a China Guardian auction which is known to do fake Pots, there are 3 , we repeat three, fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots in a rush to sell. We have looked and examine the 3 Chen Ming Yuan Pots and it’s easy to see they are fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots and they all claimed to be Early Kangxi and it’s not possible because Early Kangxi is very near to Late Ming which means the Pots which claimed to be more than 300 over years old, must have a lot of deterioration like corrosion, erosion, wear and tear,etc..on their body, lid, handle, spout or especially on the inscriptions and/or chop-marks. A Late Ming or an Early Kangxi Zisha Hu are in a highly advance stage of deterioration especially on its chop-mark and/or inscriptions. But the three Pots looked fresh, new and in perfect condition and no signs to indicate they are over 300 hundred years old even though there are chip-offs on the opening and spout of the Gourd-shaped Chen Ming Yuan Pot.
Have anybody ever wonder why until now no auctions have ever been done on a real Late Ming Shi DaBin Pot? Yes, you guess it right: very few auctions will dare do a real Late Ming Shi DaBin Pot because there are seven archaeologically excavated Late Ming Shi DaBin Pots to compare.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the only possible reason why they are in a haste to sell these 3 fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots is because the sellers or fraudsters know Ren Fu Collection’s Black-List of Fake Zisha Hus is coming out and we might put these 3 fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots in the Black-List which we will do so now after knowing the three fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots exist.
That is also why we empathize with and share her feelings when the curator of Hong Kong museum, Li Shui Yi in 2007 in the book titled, “Proceedings of then2007 International Purple-Sand Symposium” said, “ Of the more than a hundred Chen Ming Yuan Pots, I do not know which are real and which are fakes”. But the only difference between Ren Fu Collection and the honorable curator Li Shui Yi is that she does not know but we know which are genuine and which are fakes.(until now we have never seen a real Early Kangxi Chen Ming Yuan Pot outside Ren Fu Collection).
Please tell everybody about the 3 fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots in our posting or in the coming China Guardian auction and help save Old Zisha Hus and we apologize again for the delay of the next exciting archaeological stories which has been extended to 10 parts as follow:
- Introduction
- Ode to Ke Ke Lin
- Ren Fu Collection’s archaeological trove is the greatest Zisha Hu archaeological wonder in the world.
- Scale of accuracy of archaeological proofs
- Archaeological proofs of pre-Daoguang antiques collectors.
- Even the Europeans get their historical arts facts wrong.
- Can the original owner of Pot No:248 named Zheng Cheng Xu, whose wife owned the Early Kangxi Chen Ming Yuan Pot No:249, be related to Zheng Cheng Gong or better known as Koxinga?
- Ren Fu Collection’s greatest archaeological discoveries: Hui Meng Chen’s small Zhuni Hu and the Gong Fu tea
- Pre-Daoguang teacups
- Pre-Daoguang tea leaves
天哪，他们知道任富收藏的仿造紫砂壶黑名单就要来了，会揭穿他们的假紫砂壶，所以他们急着去卖他们的假陈鸣远壶………………………
二零一一年六月一日，刘创新在香港拍卖佳士得香港有限公司拍卖会上买了假的陈鸣远南瓜壶（属于K.S.LO），后来他很快就把它卖掉了，赚了钱，而宣传仍然很火热。因为他认为人们会慢慢开始思考和比较任富收藏的陈鸣远出土的陶器和考古记录。
这就是臭名昭著的伪造和贩卖假张大千画的刘创新的原因，在任富收藏开始展示道光之前的陈鸣远壶，特别是康熙早期的249号陈鸣远后，迅速销售仿造的陈鸣远壶，因为人们会慢慢了解和比较任富收藏的壶。
天哪，现在中国嘉德拍卖公司的2021秋季拍卖会上，有陈鸣远壶3件，我们重复了三个，伪造的陈鸣远壶在抢购。我们看过并检查了三个陈鸣远壶，很容易看出它们是假的陈鸣远壶，它们都声称是康熙早期，这是不可能的，因为康熙早期离晚明很近，这意味着这些声称有三百多年历史的壶肯定有很多变质，比如腐蚀、侵蚀，身体、盖子、把手、壶口或特别是铭文和/或印章上的磨损等。晚明或早康熙时期的紫砂壶，尤其是其印章和/或铭文，处于高度退化的高级阶段。但这三个壶看起来新鲜、崭新、完好无损，即使葫芦形陈鸣远壶的壶口和壶嘴上有碎屑磕碰，也没有迹象表明它们已经超过了三百年的历史。
有没有人想知道为什么直到现在还没有拍卖过真正的晚明时大彬壶？是的，你猜对了：很少有拍卖会敢做一个真正的晚明时大彬壶，因为有七个考古发掘的晚明时大彬壶可供比较。
各位嘉宾:，他们之所以急于出售这三个仿造陈鸣远壶，唯一可能的原因是卖家或骗子知道任富收藏的假冒紫砂壶黑名单即将公布，我们可能会将这三个仿造的陈鸣远壶列入黑名单，在知道这三个仿造陈鸣远壶存在后，我们现在会这样做。
这也是我们在香港中文大学博物馆馆长黎淑仪在《2007年国际紫砂学术研讨会》上所说的“一百多个陈鸣远壶，我不知道哪些是真品的，哪些是赝品”的原因。但任富收藏与尊敬的馆长黎淑仪的唯一区别在于，她不知道，但我们知道哪些是真品，哪些是假货。（到目前为止，我们在任富收藏之外还从未见过真正的康熙早期陈鸣远壶）。
请在我们的帖子或即将到来的中国嘉德拍卖会上向大家介绍三个伪造的陈鸣远壶，并帮助拯救紫砂壶，我们再次为下一个激动人心的考古故事的延迟表示歉意，该故事已扩展到以下10个部分：
1） 导言
2） 柯克林颂
3） 任富收藏的考古宝藏是世界上最大的紫砂湖考古奇观。
4） 考古证据的准确度
5） 道光以前的古董收藏家的考古证据。
6） 就连欧洲人也错误地理解了他们的历史艺术事实。
7） 第248号壶的原主人郑成祖（郑成祖的妻子拥有康熙早期的第249号陈鸣远壶是否与郑成功或更广为人知的Koxiga有 关？）
8） 任富收藏最伟大的考古发现：惠孟臣的小朱泥壶和功夫茶
9） 道光前茶杯
10）道光前茶叶
