Please take note that there 5 serial parts to this story of the Chen Ming Yuan Pot No:249. They are
- Foreword
- Ode to an Excavated Real Chen Ming Yuan Pot.
- Ode to a Fake Chen Ming Yuan Pot
- The discovery of Rouchen Gaiwan?
- How the Pot No:249(and Pot No:248) were found including who founded Gong Fu Tea?
- Four things combined to provide Accurate Conclusions including John Ng’s Brilliant Theory of the Evolution of the Shi DaBin High Lantern-shaped Pot.
- What are written about Chen Ming Yuan and the Mothers of All Forgeries.
FOREWORD
A few years ago some people advised us to let Huang Qian Liang write Ren Fu Collection’s books and archaeological stories because Huang Qian Liang can write a big story for Ren Fu Collection’s Pots and make Ren Fu Collection’s Pots worth a lot of money. We initially wanted to let Huang Qian Liang write for Ren Fu Collection but after Tony Ren’s three years of fact-findings in Taiwan which we discovered Huang Qian Liang’s heavy involvement with Fake Zisha Hus and organized fraudsters like Peng QingFu and Liu Chuan Sin, we changed our mind to let Tsai Ker Sin write which we found out later that Tsai Ker Sin with Hu WangRu are also another group of organized fraudsters out to swindle Ren Fu Collection, so we have no choice but to leave Taiwan quickly because Taiwan seems to be saddled with fraudsters and Tony Ren’s three years study of Old Zisha Hus turned out shockingly into a discovery and fact-findings of the Taiwanese Zisha Hu underworld who controlled not only Taiwanese Zisha Hu eco-system but also the influence was spreading to mainland China and the Nanyang.
Now, you good and honest people tell us: how can we let Huang Qian Liang who is a leader of a organized frauds group and who frequently write Fake stories about Fake Pots or any other dishonest, corrupted Taiwanese scholars, write Ren Fu Collection’s books?
We will tell you what will happen if Ren Fu Collection allows these dishonest, corrupted and fraudulent Taiwanese scholars to write Ren Fu Collection’s books and stories: Ren Fu Collection is a famous name for honesty, truth and genuine excavated Zisha teapots and tea wares with archaeological records. So if we let Huang Qian Liang or any other dishonest, corrupted and fraudulent Taiwanese scholar writes Ren Fu Collection’s books and stories, then Ren Fu Collection is implying that Huang Qian Liang or the other Taiwanese scholars is telling and writing the truth and who never write Fake stories for Fake Pots which makes Huang Qian Liang or the other dishonest Taiwanese scholars an honest and truthful scholar(which they are not) and which in turn makes all Huang Qian Liang’s Fake stories and Fake Pots become truthful stories and genuine Old Pots. It is like bestowing upon the dishonest, corrupted and fraudulent Taiwanese writer Ren Fu Collection’s hard won trust and goodwill of the people. It will mean Ren Fu Collection is helping Taiwanese organized fraudsters to destroy Old Zisha Hu instead of saving Old Zisha Hu. So Ladies and Gentlemen, you would agree that until we find a good, honest and uncorrupted writer( or spokesperson who is Chinese-literate), you are lumbered with Tony Ren who cannot write in beautiful, flowery Chinese like Huang Qian Liang can(who confuses and deceives people). Tony Ren cannot write beautiful, flowery Chinese verses but he can honestly, truthfully and powerfully conveys the archaeological stories of the excavated Pots that you need to know and just as important fight like a powerful Dragon against the thousands of organized fraudsters and small-time fraudsters to save Old Zisha Hu.
请注意，陈明远朱泥壶249号的故事有5个系列部分，他们是：
1） 前言；
2） 出土的真品陈鸣远壶颂；
3） 颂假陈鸣远壶；
4） 若深杯的特别发现？
5） 第249号壶（和第248号壶）是如何发现的，包括谁创建了功夫茶？
6） 四件事结合在一起，提供了准确的结论，包括John Ng关于时大彬高灯笼形壶演变的卓越理论。
7） 关于陈明远和所有赝品之母的文章。
前言
几年前，有人建议我们让黄健亮写任富收藏的书籍和考古故事，因为黄健亮可以为任富收藏的壶写一个大故事，让任富收藏的壶值很多钱。我们最初想让黄健亮为任富收藏的藏品写作，但在任汤尼在台湾进行了三年的事实调查后，我们发现黄健亮与假紫砂壶有着密切的关系，并组织了像彭清福和刘创新这样的骗子，我们改变主意让彩格森辛编写，后来发现蔡格森和胡万如也是一伙有组织的骗徒，目的是骗取任富藏品，因此，我们别无选择，只能迅速离开台湾，因为台湾似乎背负着欺诈者的重担，任汤尼（Tony Ren）对老紫砂壶进行了三年的研究，结果令人震惊地发现，台湾紫砂壶是黑社会不仅控制着台湾的紫砂壶生态系统，而且其影响力正在向大陆扩散中国和南洋。
现在，你们这些善良诚实的人告诉我们：我们怎么能让一个有组织的诈骗团伙的头目，经常写关于假壶或任何其他不诚实、腐败的台湾学者的假故事的黄健亮，不可能让他写任富收藏的书？
我们将告诉你，如果任富收藏允许这些不诚实、腐败和欺诈的台湾学者写任富藏品的书籍和故事，将会发生什么：任富收藏是一个诚实、真实和有考古记录的真正出土紫砂茶壶和茶具的著名名称。因此，如果我们让黄健亮或任何其他不诚实、腐败和欺诈的台湾学者撰写任富收藏的书籍和故事，那么任富收藏就意味着黄健亮或其他台湾学者在讲真话、写真话，他们从不为假壶写假故事，这使得黄健亮或其他不诚实的台湾学者成为诚实、真实的学者（他们不是）而这反过来又使得黄健亮的所有假故事和假壶都变成了真实的故事和真正的老壶。这就像是给了不诚实、腐败和欺诈的台湾作家任富藏品来之不易的信任和人民的善意。这将意味着任富藏品正在帮助台湾有组织的骗子摧毁旧紫砂壶，而不是拯救老紫砂壶。因此，女士们，先生们，你们会同意，除非我们找到一位优秀、诚实、廉洁的作家（或有中国文化的代言人），否则你们会遇到任汤尼，他不能像黄健亮那样用漂亮、华丽的中文写作（他迷惑和欺骗人们）。任汤尼无法写出优美、华丽的中国诗句，但他可以诚实、真实、有力地传达出土陶器的考古故事，你需要了解这些故事，就像一条强大的龙一样，与数千名有组织的骗子和小时间的骗子进行斗争，以拯救老紫砂壶。
ODE TO AN EXCAVATED REAL CHEN MING YUAN POT
If someone excavated one grave and then says he has found a real Chen Ming Yuan Pot, you would think he is mad or lying; if a few people excavated one hundred graves and then say they have found a real Chen Ming Yuan Pot, you would think it is possible but not likely but if a big group of people excavated one thousand graves and then they say they have found a real Chen Ming Yuan Pot, you would think it is very possible and highly likely.
ODE TO A FAKE CHEN MING YUAN POT
If a museum says it has the only Fake Chen Ming Yuan Pot in the world, you would think it is possible; if a few museums say they have ten Chen Ming Yuan Pots, you would think it is very unlikely but if a few museums say they have together hundreds of Chen Ming Yuan Pots, then you would immediately say it is crazy and impossible.
(Note: Not every excavated grave had a Zisha Pot and about 30% of excavated graves were empty graves with nothing except miniature funeral tea wares or other cheap artefacts or cultural relics usually belonging to poor Chinese).
The next part of the story brings us back to the moment Pot No:249 and Pot No:248 were discovered in a double excavations of a husband and wife graves which, luck has it that, we not only stumbled upon the highly likely real Chen Ming Yuan Pot but also discovered within the wife’s grave, that was inside the coffin and on top of the coffin, one of the earliest archaeological proofs that Fujian people started or if you like created the Gong Fu Tea culture and not the Chao Zhou people as believed by Guangdong people. In fact most of the original owners of excavated Meng Chen Zhuni Pots found with Gong Fu tea wares were Fujian people and the Chao Zhou Gong Fu Tea Culture only started in Daoguang when Chao Zhou Zhuni Pots(also called Santoh Zhuni Pots) became very popular in Chao Zhou or Chaoshan as evident from our excavated Daoguang Gong Fu tea wares containing Chao Zhou Zhuni Hus belonging to mostly Chao Zhou or Guangdong people. This archaeological discovery is another example of many history-changing or monumental discoveries found in Ren Fu Collection’s thousands of excavations.
That is why we keep saying time is on Ren Fu Collection’s side because you do not know how many awesome discoveries lies hidden in Ren Fu Collection’s huge treasure trove of archaeological materials and records which are only found out as our archaeological stories are told. Yes, in “time is on Ren Fu Collection’s side” we do not mean we will win and destroy organized frauds, Fake Pots and Fake stories, it also mean Ren Fu Collection will transform the chaotic, dishonest, corrupted and fraudulent Old Zisha Hu eco-system into a healthy, trusted and respected eco-system where it is respected like other normal Works of Art and not despised and condemned by Arts critics universally as chaotic and full of Fake Pots and Fake facts.
出土真陈鸣远壶颂
如果有人挖出一个墓穴，然后说他找到了一个真正的陈鸣远壶，你会认为他疯了或在撒谎；如果有几个人挖掘了一百个坟墓，然后说他们发现了一个真正的陈鸣远壶，你会认为这是可能的，但不太可能。但是如果有一大群人挖掘了一千个坟墓，然后说他们发现了一个真正的陈鸣远壶，你会认为这是非常可能的，而且可能性很大。
假陈鸣远壶颂
如果一个博物馆说它有世界上唯一一个伪造的陈鸣远壶，你会认为这是可能的；如果有几家博物馆说他们有十个陈鸣远壶，你会认为这是不可能的，但是如果有几家博物馆说他们有数百个陈鸣远朱泥壶，那么你会立即说这是疯狂和不可能的。
（注：并非所有挖掘出的坟墓都有紫砂壶，大约30%的挖掘出的坟墓都是空坟墓，除了微型丧葬茶具或其他通常属于穷人的廉价手工艺品或文物外，什么都没有）。
故事的下一部分让我们回到249号陈鸣远朱泥壶和248号邵叔森朱泥壶在一对夫妇坟墓的双重挖掘中被发现的那一刻，幸运的是，我们不仅偶然发现了极有可能是真的陈鸣远朱泥壶，而且在妻子的坟墓中发现了，那就是棺材内和棺材顶部，这是最早的考古证据之一，证明福建人开始或创造了功夫茶文化，而不是广东人所相信的潮州人。事实上，出土的惠孟臣朱泥壶和工夫茶具的原始主人大多是福建人，而潮州工夫茶文化是在潮州朱泥壶（也称汕头朱泥壶）在道光时期开始的在潮州或潮汕非常流行，从我们出土的道光时期工夫茶具中可以看出，这些茶具中含有潮州朱泥壶，主要属于潮州人或广东人。这一考古发现是任富收藏数千次发掘中发现的许多改变历史或纪念性发现的另一个例子。
这就是为什么我们一直说时间是属于任富收藏的，因为你不知道任富收藏的考古材料和记录的巨大宝藏中隐藏着多少令人敬畏的发现，而这些都是在我们讲述考古故事时才发现的。是的，在“时间站在任富收藏一边”中，我们并不意味着我们将赢得和摧毁有组织的欺诈、假壶和假故事，它还意味着任富收藏将把混乱、不诚实、腐败和欺诈的老紫砂壶生态系统转变为一个健康的生态系统，值得信赖和尊重的生态系统，它像其他正常的艺术作品一样受到尊重，而不是被艺术评论家普遍鄙视和谴责为混乱、充满假壶和假事实。
THE DISCOVERY OF SMALL ROUCHEN GAIWAN?…………………………………………………………
According to experts, Rouchen teacups appeared during Kangxi reign. Yes, we agree because according to Ren Fu Collection’s excavated tea, teapots and tea wares with archaeological materials and records, it was during Kangxi that Rouchen teacups appeared and could the Rouchen teacups take several forms instead of just teacups with the inscriptions Rouchen on the base of the teacups? (Ren Fu Collection has many Early Kangxi Rouchen teacups in the 2nd and 3rd One Thousand Pots).We asked that question because a lot, a lot of wealthy and Guangren’s graves and tombs contained beautiful, exquisite teacups with Emperor’s reign mark on the bottom of the cups instead of the words Rouchen. And exactly like Rouchen teacups and sometimes even better, these teacups with reign-marks are small, fine milk-white texture and finely made. In fact in the best or most opulent graves or tombs we found exquisite teacups with Emperor’s reign mark but teacups with the inscription Rouchen were found in average or moderately wealthy graves. Why is that, we asked you, a teacup with the Emperor’s reign mark found in graves/tombs belonging to the highest hierarchy in society and not Rouchen teacups? We ask two more questions: Could these Emperor reign marked teacups and Rouchen teacups be of the same quality and make but with different wordings on the base of the cup? And could Rouchen be just a brand name for quality and status symbol but the teacups with the Emperor reign marks be the same quality and make as Rouchen teacups but with more prestige and power?……which brings us to another interesting but altogether different teacups called small Gaiwans or Gaipei. It has come to our attention while organizing the warehouse full of thousands of teacups and other artefacts that we found unusual small Gaiwans or Gaipei which look like Rouchen teacups with lid which, unlike the usual big Gaiwan that is the size of a bowl, the small Gaiwans have the quality and texture like Rouchen teacups or teacups with Emperor reign marks. And when we let tea experts friends make tea in the same small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot but drank in the Rouchen teacups, teacups with Emperor reign mark and small Gaiwan or Gaipei, they all said the same thing that the tea taste the best in all three types of teacups which means the three tea drinking vessels give the same result.Could tea drinkers in Pre-Daoguang know things we don’t? This might be something for the tea experts or connoisseurs to think about in the future.
小若深盖碗的发现？…………
据专家介绍，若深茶杯出现于康熙年间。是的，我们同意，因为根据任富收藏出土的茶壶茶具和考古资料和记载，若深茶杯是在康熙年间出现的，而且若深茶杯可以有多种形式，而不仅仅是底部刻有“若深珍藏”款铭文的茶杯的茶杯？ （任富收藏二、三千壶中有许多康熙初年的若深茶杯）。我们问这个问题是因为很多富人和官人的墓葬中，都藏有精美精美的茶杯，茶杯底部有皇帝的年号。杯子代替了若深这两个字。和若深茶杯一模一样，有时甚至更好，这些带有统治标志的茶杯很小，纯奶白色，做工精细。事实上，在最好或最豪华的坟墓或墓葬中，我们发现了带有皇帝在位标记的精美茶杯，但在一般或中等富裕的坟墓中发现了若深铭文的茶杯。为什么，我们问你，在社会最高等级的坟墓/墓葬中发现的带有皇帝年号的茶杯，而不是若深茶杯？我们再问两个问题：这些帝王茶杯和若深茶杯，是否质量相同，制作相同，但杯底的文字不同？难道若深只是品质和身份象征的品牌名称，而带有皇帝印记的茶杯与若深茶杯的质量和制作相同，但更具威望和权力吗？……这就给我们带来了另一个有趣但完全不同的茶杯，称为小盖碗。我们注意到，在整理装满数以千计茶杯和其他文物的仓库时，我们发现了不寻常的小盖碗，看起来像带盖的若深茶杯，与通常的碗大小的大盖碗不同，小盖碗具有品质和质地，如若深茶杯或帝王印记茶杯。而当我们让茶友朋友在同一个小孟臣朱泥壶里泡茶，却喝了若深茶杯、帝王印记茶杯和小盖碗时，他们都说这三种茶的味道是最好的。茶杯，即三个饮茶器的结果相同。道光前的饮茶者能知道我们不知道的事情吗？这可能是未来茶叶专家或鉴赏家需要考虑的事情。
HOW THE POT NO:249(and Pot No:248) WERE FOUND INCLUDING WHO FOUNDED GONG FU TEA?…………………………………………..
To quote the late legendary marine archaeologist and treasure hunter, Sten Sjostrand, who said in his book “ The Wanli Shipwreck”: In almost every case, shipwreck cargoes have upset past scholarship” which means that some of what scholars have written are proven by shipwreck cargoes to be wrong and needed correction. And needless to say, it also applies to Ren Fu Collection’s archaeological discoveries which prove a lot, a lot or what the scholars have written are wrong and needed correcting.
According to archaeological materials and records kept by Ren Fu Collection, PotNo:248 was excavated first before Pot No:249 which we later found out to be the earliest Chen Ming Yuan Zisha Hu excavated in the world.
But like we said before Ren Fu Collection’s thousands of excavated teapots and tea wares with archaeological records, like a huge trawler net catching fishes in the sea, contain a lot, a lot of discoveries-some known, some new and unknown and some history-changing so much so anyone expose to so huge an amount of precious treasure trove of rare archaeological materials, data and discoveries, the person automatically becomes a true expert in Old Zisha Hu. This is like living in another world or another eco-system of Zisha Hu where everything is true, genuine, authentic with exact-dating and true history just like other normal, honest Works of Art and more where we take you back in time to the Pre-Daoguang original owners. This huge untapped knowledge and experience from Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological treasure trove, we will share with you good, honest people the aim of which is to save Old Zisha Hu, by pushing in true, honest knowledge and pushing out Fake knowledge, fake facts and fake stories, created by organized fraudsters, into the dustbin of history.
Right, going back to the excavation story, the smaller-than-usual but very elegant and intact tomb from which Pot No:248 was found in had a tombstone epitaph dating the death of the owner to the 28th Year of Kangxi Reign. Finding Pot No:249, unlike finding Pot No:248 which was easy, was more difficult because of the disintegrated and collapsed grave indicating the owner died much earlier than the person in the tomb next to it. We believed these tomb and grave were a husband and wife burial site.( Tombs are built of stone above or under ground but graves are made of earth’. Most of husband and wife graves were housed together in one big grave or one big burial mound but sometimes the husband and wife graves were located separately next to one another: husband on the right and wife on the left side. Ren Fu Collection’s archaeological records say Pot No:249 was excavated and found with the Pot were a pair of small teacups with lids, a clay cauldron, a burner, a water boiler, two Kangxi coins, broken bowls and oyster shells.( it was noted that we lost the coins, broken bowls and oyster shells which probably got mixed up in the huge warehouse of excavated teapots, tea wares and other cultural relics and lately noted that we have found the oyster shells). The broken bowls or shards and oyster shells were found in the top soil which was above the coffin indicating the deceased owner’s love for oysters when she was alive.
Excavation of the grave containing Pot No:249 confirmed the general claim by most experts that Chen Ming Yuan was an Early Kangxi Potter and that Pot No:249 could very likely be one of the earliest Pots made by Chen Ming Yuan.
How we calculate Pot No:249’s age or Niande went like this: we know Pot No:249 belonged to the wife of a man whose name was Zheng Sheng Zu in whose tomb we found Pot No:248. The husband who originated from Longxi, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China died on the 28th Year Reign of Emperor Kangxi as stated on the tombstone epitaph(see classified picture of partial tombstone epitaph for archaeological proof) and so based on our huge experience and knowledge of Pre-Daoguang tombs and graves, we estimated the wife should have passed away at least in Kangxi 22nd Year Reign or earlier. Furthermore the Pot No:249 looks used indicating Pot No:249 was made many years earlier and transported overseas to Nanyang, all in all using the Law of Averages in Mathematics it tells us the Pot No:249 could likely be made before the 16th Year of Kangxi’s Reign which is extremely early meaning that Pot No:249 could be made by a very young Chen Ming Yuan. But that’s not all because we also made a monumental or paradigm changing discovery in the oyster shells which were usually found in Pre-Daoguang Fujian people’s graves and tombs especially those of Early Qing. How we archaeologically prove who started Gong Fu tea culture is the same as how we archaeologically prove the Pot No:249 is a real Chen Ming Yuan: yes, through knowing their earliest existence. Pot No:249 is the earliest Chen Ming Yuan known to exist and the woman owner of the Early Kangxi Pot No:249 was Fujian including the fact that most of Ren Fu Collection’s excavated Early Qing Gong Fu tea wares especially those of Kangxi reign belonged to Fujian people going by their place of origin as stated on the gravestone/tombstone epitaphs. Furthermore most Gong Fu tea wares with Meng Chen Zhuni Hu were found in Early Qing Fujian graves/tombs. Until today Meng Chen Zhuni Pot is a must in Fujian or Taiwanese Gong Fu tea and until today Fujian people and Taiwanese love their unique cultural food the oysters in the forms of oyster soups or fried oysters which are known as Fujian creations. That is how we know the woman who owned Pot No:249 was Fujian and her Gong Fu tea wares of Zisha Pot, teacups, burner and water boiler is the earliest set of Gong Fu tea wares excavated with archaeological records in the world. Chao Zhou people obviously from Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological materials, records and discoveries did not start Gong Fu tea culture but Chao Zhou people did promote in a big way their own version of Gong Fu tea using Santoh Zhuni Hus or if you prefer Chao Zhou Zhuni Pots. It was the Fujian people whom Ren Fu Collection has overwhelming archaeological proofs started Gong Fu tea and also Daoguang was the period that saw the meteoric rise of Santoh Zhuni Hu as evident in Ren Fu Collection’s huge collection of excavated Pre-Daoguang Santoh Zhuni Hus which were mostly found in Guangdong people’s graves/tombs(Chao Zhou is part of Guangdong). Chao Zhou or Fujian people notwithstanding, the most important thing is Gong Fu Tea culture started in China and we Chinese everywhere are very proud of the fact…….yes, of course thanks to the foresight of the boss of Ren Fu Collection that today we can solve a big Gong Fu Tea mystery easily. And before we go into the next part Ren Fu Collection who is well-known for truth and honesty, do not think our other top grade Early Qing Chen Ming Yuan Pots are genuine Chen Ming Yuan Pots, we believe the Pots are Chen Ming Yuan copies, that is, exquisite Pots like Pot No’s:571 and 603 among others.
A short note or explanation of the method we use to calculate accurately whether a Pot is a real Old Famous Potters or Old Master Potters which we called the TIME LAPSE BETWEEN UNKNOWN TO FAME. This is a very effective method to authenticate an Old Pot to find out whether it’s a real Old Master Potters/or Old Famous Potters or if you like a way of sifting out Old copies from authentic Pots. This method is based on the fact that an Old Master Potter or Old Famous Potter started making Pots when he/she was not famous and so nobody copied his/her Pots but when the Old Potter became famous as an Old Master or Old Famous Potter then Old Copies or even forgeries appeared. This is the fool-proof way of authenticating Pot No:249 because in our thousands of Pots, there are no Early Kangxi Copies and copies or forgeries only started later in Yongzheng, Qian Long, Jiajing and Daoguang.
壶号：249（和壶号：248）是如何被发现的，包括谁创立了功夫茶？………………..
引用已故的传奇人物海洋考古学家和寻宝者 Sten Sjostrand 在他的著作《万历海难》中所说的：几乎在所有情况下，海难货物都扰乱了过去的学术研究”，这意味着学者所写的一些东西已经被海难证明了货物有误，需要更正。不用说，这也适用于任富收藏的考古发现，证明很多，很多或学者所写的都是错误的，需要纠正。
根据任富收藏所保存的考古资料和记载，248号壶先于249号壶出土，后发现是世界上最早出土的陈鸣远朱泥壶。
但就像我们之前说的，任富藏品出土的数千件有考古记录的茶壶和茶具，就像一张巨大的拖网在大海中捕鱼，包含着很多很多的发现——一些已知的，一些新的和未知的，还有一些历史——变化如此之大，以至于任何人接触到如此庞大的珍贵考古资料、资料和发现的宝库，自然而然地成为了紫砂壶老的高手。这就像生活在另一个世界或紫砂壶的另一个生态系统中，一切都是真实的，准确的年代和真实的历史，就像其他正常，诚实的艺术品一样，我们带您回到过去前道光原主。任富收藏品庞大的考古宝库中的大量未开发的知识和经验，我们将与您分享以《拯救老紫砂泥茶壶》为目的的善良正直的人和由有组织的欺诈者创造的虚假故事进入历史的垃圾箱。
对了，说回发掘故事，出土的248号邵叔森朱泥壶的古墓规模虽小，但十分雅致完整，墓志铭的墓志铭是康熙二十八年的主人逝世。找到249号陈鸣远朱泥壶，不像找到248号壶容易，难度更大，因为坟墓解体倒塌，表明主人比旁边坟墓里的人死得更早。我们认为这些坟墓和坟墓是夫妻墓地。（坟墓在地上或地下用石头建造，但坟墓是用土制成的。大多数夫妻坟墓一起被安置在一个大坟墓或一个大坟墓中但有时夫妻坟墓是彼此分开的：丈夫在右边，妻子在左边。任富收藏的考古记录说，出土的壶号：249，与壶一起发现的是一对小茶杯、陶罐、火炉、水锅、两枚康熙钱币、破碗和牡蛎壳。 、茶具等文物，最近发现发现了牡蛎壳。棺材上方的表层土壤中发现了破碎的碗或碎片和牡蛎壳，表明已故主人在她去世时对牡蛎的热爱生活。
249号陈鸣远朱泥壶发掘证实了大多数专家的普遍说法，即陈鸣远是康熙早期的陶器，249号壶很可能是陈鸣远制作的最早的陶器之一。
我们如何计算249号陈鸣远朱泥壶的年代是这样的：我们知道249号壶属于一个名叫郑生祖的男人的妻子，我们在他的坟墓中发现了248号壶。来自中国福建漳州的丈夫去世于康熙二十八年墓碑上（考古证明见部分墓碑墓志分类图片）等基于我们丰富的经验和知识-道光墓葬，我们估计这夫人至少应该在康熙二十二年或更早的时候就去世了。此外，第 249 号壶看起来使用过，表明第 249 号壶是多年前制造并运往海外到南洋，总而言之，使用数学中的平均法则它告诉我们第 249 号鸣远壶可能是在第 16 年之前制造的康熙年间，这是极早的意思，壶号：249 可以由一个非常年轻的陈鸣远制作。但这还不是全部，因为我们还在道光时期前福建人的坟墓中，尤其是清初的墓葬中常见的牡蛎壳中做出了巨大的或改变了范式的发现。我们从考古学上证明谁是工夫茶文化的始祖，就像我们从考古学上证明第249号壶是真正的陈鸣远一样：是的，通过知道他们最早的存在。壶号：249 是已知最早存在的陈鸣远，康熙初期的女主人壶No:249 是福建人，包括任富收藏所出土的清初工夫茶器，特别是康熙年间的茶器，大部分都是福建人的，按照墓碑/墓碑上的墓志铭，都是福建人的。此外，大多数带有孟臣朱泥壶的工夫茶器都在清初福建墓葬中发现。直到今天，孟臣朱泥壶是福建或台湾工夫茶的必备品，直到今天福建人和台湾人都喜欢他们独特的文化食品，牡蛎汤或炸牡蛎被称为福建创作美食。这就是我们知道拥有第249号壶的女人是福建人，她的紫砂壶、茶杯、炉灶和开水器是世界上最早的一套有考古记录的工夫茶具。潮州人显然来自任富收藏的大量考古材料、记录和发现并没有开创工夫茶文化，但潮州人确实使用汕头朱泥壶或如果您更喜欢潮州朱泥，大力推广他们自己的工夫茶壶。任富收藏具有压倒性考古证据的福建人开创了工夫茶，而道光也是见证了汕头朱泥壶的迅速崛起的时期。多见于广东人的墓葬（潮州是广东的一部分）。不管是潮州人还是福建人，最重要的是工夫茶文化起源于中国，我们各地的中国人都为此感到非常自豪…….是的，当然感谢任富收藏老板的远见卓识，今天我们可以轻松解开一个功夫茶的大谜团。在我们进入下一部分以诚实的任富收藏之前，不要以为我们其他上品清初陈鸣远壶是真正的陈鸣远壶，我们相信这些壶是陈鸣远复制品，也就是像 Pot No’s:571 和 603 等精美的壶。
对我们用来准确计算壶是真正的著名老陶艺家还是老陶艺大师的方法的简短说明或解释，我们将其称为“不为人知的名人之间的时间间隔”。这是一种非常有效的方法来验证旧陶器，以确定它是否是真正的老陶艺大师/或古老的著名陶艺家，或者您是否喜欢从正宗陶罐中筛选出旧复制品的方法。这种方法是基于这样一个事实，即老陶艺大师或著名老陶艺师在他/她并不出名时就开始制作陶罐，因此没有人复制他/她的陶罐，但是当老陶艺大师或老陶艺大师成为著名的古陶大师或老陶艺时出现了老仿甚至赝品。这是鉴定第249号壶的万无一失的方法，因为在我们的数千把壶中，没有康熙早期的复制品，也没有雍正、乾隆、嘉庆和道光后期的复制品或赝品。
