AN AFTERTHOUGHT FOR THE MOST UNDERRATED OLD MASTER POTTER AND FILIAL SON, HUI YI GONG…………………………………………
A Zisha Hu friend and follower of Ren Fu Collection’s postings, messaged us to tell us that there is a Pot in Mai Foundation that was made by Hui Yi Gong and look exactly like Ren Fu Collection’s Pot No:387: the legendary Hui Meng Chen Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot.( see picture of Mai Foundation Hui Yi Gong Pot and Ren Fu Collection’s Pot No:387).
Yes, we are not surprised as we have theorized before that there may be more undiscovered similar shapes Meng Chen-Yi Gong out there in the market and yes, thank you for informing us because that Mai Foundation Hui Yi Gong Pot has further confirmed what we have been saying was the truth even though without that Mai Foundation Hui Yi Gong Pot, Ren Fu Collection has enough archaeological proofs to support our claim. Now you all can see and understand very clearly if you look at Ren Fu Collection’s Yongzheng Hui Yi Gong High Lantern-shaped Pot No:548 and the Victoria and Albert Museum Tianqi 7th year reign Hui Meng Chen High Lantern-shaped Pot and now plus the above-mentioned Hui Yi Gong Low Lantern-shaped Pot belonging to Mai Foundation and Ren Fu Collection’s Hui Meng Chen’s Low Lantern-shaped Pot No:387, and many other similar shapes pair of Hui Meng Chen-Hui Yi Gong Zhuni Pots in Ren Fu Collection’s archaeological trove, we have no doubt made a distinct discovery about the relationship between Hui Yi Gong and Hui Meng Chen: Yes, Ladies and Gentlmen, Ren Fu Collection’s Hui Yi Gong Pot No:548 shows that Hui Yi Gong made a similar-shaped Pot in Yongzheng to Hui Meng Chen’s early Pot , the Victoria and Albert Museum’s Hui Meng Chen Tianqi 7th year reign High Lantern-shaped Zisha Pot and now not surprisingly we found Hui Yi Gong in Yongzheng also made a similar shape to Ren Fu Collection’s Hui Meng Chen’s late Pot, the legendary Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot No:387. And there are more similar shape Hui Meng Chen-Hui Yi Gong Pots in Ren Fu Collection’s archaeological trove of excavated Meng Chen and Yi Gong Pots. In fact we also discovered Hui Meng Chen and Hui Yi Gong were specialists in Lantern-shaped Pots whether high lantern, medium lantern or low lantern shaped Pots as found in the hundred of Lantern-shaped Pots with Meng Chen and Yi Gong’s names without including those Meng Chen Santoh Zhuni Pots with Lantern shapes.( even Siting shape and Pan-Hu shape Pots have Meng Chen and Yi Gong’s names on them)
It is hard to believe Hui Yi Gong was a loyal student with the same surname as Hui Meng Chen and without the slightest streak of rebelliousness or individualism in him but to do exactly what his master or teacher did unless of course Hui Yi Gong was more than a student to Hui Meng Chen, his teacher? And in fact based on the excavated Hui Yi Gong Pots in Ren Fu Collection and unearthed Yi Gong Pots in the market, Hui Yi Gong did possess Old Master’s skill even though most of his works replicated Hui Meng Chen’s works which mostly indicated he chose to live under his teacher’s shadow which, in turn, begs this question: which student in their right mind would be happy to live under his teacher’s shadow unless the teacher was also his father because all students always tried to outdo their teachers whenever they can. Yes, we in Ren Fu Collection have such a big archaeological trove that we could penetrate into the deep mystery of not just Hui Meng Chen’s mind and philosophy but the mystery of his relationship to Hui Yi Gong. And what’s more Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove of Daoguang, Jiaqing and Late Qian Long similar shape Meng Chen and Yi Gong Zhuni Pots coincided with the mass production of almost all Meng Chen Zhuni Pots with the occasional Yi Gong Zhuni Pots with similar shapes ( and no other Old Potters).
Ladies and Gentlemen, there is no filial student in this world, new and old, but there was/is only a filial son and with the perfect father-son timeline proofs of Hui Meng Chen and Hui Yi Gong in Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove( see timeline chart of Hui Meng Chen-Hui Yi Gong in previous posting) nothing can shake this conclusion that Hui Yi Gong was the son of the greatest and most popular Old Master Potter of all times, Hui Meng Chen.
The similar shape Yongzheng Hui Yi Gong Low Lantern-shaped Pot in Mai Foundation only added more proofs that Hui Meng Chen’s (or his father’s) small Zhuni Pot which Ren Fu Collection excavated from a Late Chongzhen/Shunzhi grave belonging to a Fujian in the Nanyang, was indeed the legendary Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot the Chinese tea culture world has been talking about until now but did not have any archaeogical proof. And just like the Ren Fu Collection’s similar shape Yongzheng Hui Yi Gong High Lantern-shaped Pot No:548 proved the Tianqi 7th year reign Hui Meng Chen High Lantern-shaped Pot in the Victoria and Albert museum, London, was Hui Meng Chen’s early work.
We end this discourse on Hui Yi Gong by showing you pictures of Pot No: 128 where Chen Ming Yuan, an Old Master Potter, showed his respect to Hui Yi Gong and possibly his equal, and Pan-Hu, Pot No:683, showing his respect to Hui Meng Chen with a Song Dynasty poem which reflected Hui Meng Chen’s character.
P/S.. To leave no doubt for the critics or detractors, we will insist on DNA testing of 1) Zheng Cheng Xu’s bones, the original owner of Pot No:248 to determine if he was the descendant of Zheng Cheng Gong even though we know he was Fujian from the tombstone epitaph and 2) Tea leaves found in many Early Qing graves/tombs to determine whether the tea leaves were Wuyi or from other regions to bring to a closure the rivalry between Fujian and Chao Zhou scholars to the claim of who invented Gong Fu Tea.
对最被低估的陶艺老师傅和孝子惠逸公的深思…………………………………………
一位紫砂壶的朋友，也是任富收藏的追随者，留言告诉我们，成阳基金会有一把壶，是惠逸公做的，和任富收藏的壶号：387一模一样：传说中的惠逸公小孟臣朱泥壶（见成阳基金会的惠逸公壶及任富收藏壶编号：387）。
是的，我们并不感到惊讶，因为我们之前推测市场上可能有更多未被发现的类似形状的孟臣逸公，是的，感谢您通知我们，因为成阳基金会惠逸公款壶已经进一步证实了我们一直说的都是事实，尽管没有成阳基金会的惠逸公壶，任富藏品有足够的考古证据支持我们的说法。现在大家看看任富收藏的雍正时期惠逸公大灯壶No:548和维多利亚和阿尔伯特博物馆天启七年惠孟臣大灯壶，现在大家都可以看得很清楚了。上面提到的成阳基金会惠逸公款低灯壶，任富收藏的惠孟臣小灯壶No:387，还有许多其他类似形状的一对惠孟臣和惠逸公款朱泥壶在任富收藏的考古宝库，我们无疑对惠逸公和惠孟臣的关系有了明显的发现：是的，女士们，先生们，任富收藏的惠逸公壶号：548表明，惠逸公制作了一个类似的形状雍正时期壶到惠孟臣早期壶，维多利亚和阿尔伯特博物馆的惠孟臣天启七年高灯形紫砂壶，现在不出意外我们发现雍正惠逸公也与任富收藏的晚期惠孟臣做出了相似的形状，传说中的小孟臣朱泥壶No:387。而在任富收藏出土的孟臣、逸公壶的考古宝库中，还有更多类似形状的惠孟臣和惠逸公壶。事实上，我们也发现惠孟臣和惠逸公是灯笼壶的专家，无论是高灯笼、中灯还是低灯笼壶，都在数百个有孟臣和逸公名字的灯笼壶中发现，但不包括那些孟臣款汕头朱泥灯笼形壶（连思亭、潘壶上都有孟臣和逸公的名字）。
很难相信惠逸公是一个和惠孟臣同姓的忠实学生，身上没有丝毫的叛逆和个人主义倾向，但要完全按照他的老师或老师所做的那样去做，除非惠逸公当然超过他的老师惠孟臣的学生？而事实上，从任富收藏中出土的惠逸公壶和市面上出土的逸公壶来看，惠逸公确实具备老主人的技艺，尽管他的大部分作品都是复制了惠孟臣的作品，大多数表明他选择了生活在老师的阴影下，这反过来又引出了一个问题：除非老师也是他的父亲，否则哪个头脑正常的学生会乐于生活在老师的阴影下，因为所有学生总是尽可能地超越老师。是的，我们任富收藏有这么大的考古宝藏，我们不仅可以深入了解惠孟臣的思想和哲学，还可以了解他与惠逸公的关系之谜。更何况任富收藏的道光、嘉庆、乾隆晚期类似孟臣、逸公朱泥壶的巨量考古宝库，恰逢孟臣朱泥壶几乎全部量产，偶有形似逸公朱泥壶（及没有其他老陶艺师）。
女士们先生们，这个世界上没有孝顺的学生，无论新老，只有一个孝顺的儿子，在任富收藏的巨大考古宝库中，还有惠孟臣和惠逸公完美的父子时间证明（见之前发文的惠孟臣、惠逸公时间线图）没有什么能动摇这个结论，即惠逸公是有史以来最伟大、最受欢迎的陶艺老大师惠孟臣的儿子。
成阳基金会有一把类似雍正时期惠逸公低灯壶，只是增加了任富收藏在南洋某福建崇祯/顺治晚期墓中出土的惠孟臣（或父亲）小朱泥壶的证据。 ，的确是中国茶文化界至今津津乐道的传说中的小孟臣朱泥壶，但没有任何考古证据。而与任富藏品类似的造型雍正惠逸公大灯壶No:548证明了伦敦维多利亚和阿尔伯特博物馆收藏的天启七年惠梦辰大灯壶是惠孟臣的早期作品。
我们通过向您展示 128 号壶的照片来结束本次关于惠逸公的讨论，其中陈鸣远的一位老陶艺大师，表达了他对惠逸公以及可能是他的平等人的尊重，以及潘壶，编号：683，展示了 他用一首宋代诗词反映惠孟臣的性格表达了对惠孟臣的敬意。
P/S.. 为了不让批评者怀疑，我们将坚持对： 1) 248 号壶的原主人郑成旭的骨头进行 DNA 检测，以确定他是否是郑成功的后裔，尽管 从墓志铭我们知道他是福建人 ；2）在许多清初的墓葬中发现了茶叶，以确定茶叶是武夷还是其他地区的茶叶，以结束福建和潮州学者之间对发明功夫茶的争论。
AMAZING DISCOVERY OF MOBILE GONG FU TEA BY REN FU COLLECTION…………………
We intentionally saved and kept this archaeological discovery separate for another topic towards the end because this discovery has more to do with Gong Fu Tea and how it was practiced in different ways in Pre-Daoguang times, than it has to do with the discoveries of Hui Meng Chen, the legendary Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot and the birth of Gong Fu Tea.
Most people including scholars( but not historians) failed to take the backdrop of Chinese tea culture during the Transition Period into serious consideration. The backdrop of NanMing wars and ensuing fear and turmoil played a big part in determining the mode of tea drinking especially in Fujian the last bastion of NanMing and center of pioneering Gong Fu Tea. Vigorous study and research on Chinese tea culture of the Transition Period vis-a-vis Jingdezhen, Yixing and Wuyi tea production must take into account the effects of the NanMing wars and the resultant turmoil, fear and the magnified problem of everyday life which in tea making and tea drinking faced a conundrum of time restraint and fear compounded by the desire to make the best quality in the process which in wartime situations where time is of the essence.(= must do things as quickly as possible)
Luckily for study and research, we in Ren Fu Collection has what scholars and PHD researchers wanted: archaeological proofs how Chinese tea culture progressed in the most basic ways of everyday life. Yes, Ladies and Gentlemen, we have discovered in Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove, among many, many other things, two alternative modes of tea drinking in Pre-Daoguang times: one is a mobile Gong Fu Tea and the other is a home-made Gong Fu Tea.(in modern comparison imagine the bulky home land-line telephone and the small mobile phone). Yes, in Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove, we have found real life burners that had been used we classified as medium-sized burners(see pictures of used medium-sized burners and burners with charcoals) for mobile Gong Fu Tea and big burners used for making tea at home.(compare that to the huge cauldron on huge burner or stove in tea houses).
任富收藏系列移动功夫茶的惊人发现……………………
我们特意保存了这个考古发现，并将其单独用于另一个话题，因为这个发现更多的是与功夫茶以及道光前的不同实践方式有关，而不是与惠孟臣、传说中的小孟臣朱泥壶和功夫茶的诞生有关。
包括学者（但不包括历史学家）在内的大多数人都没有认真考虑转型时期中国茶文化的背景。南明战争的背景以及随之而来的恐惧和动荡在很大程度上决定了饮茶的方式，尤其是在福建南明的最后堡垒和开创功夫茶的中心。对景德镇、宜兴和武夷茶生产过渡时期中国茶文化的大力研究，必须考虑到南明战争的影响以及由此产生的动荡、恐惧和茶中日常生活的放大问题制作和喝茶面临时间限制和恐惧的难题，加上在时间至关重要的战时情况下想要在过程中制造最佳质量的愿望。（=必须尽快做事）
幸运的是学习和研究，我们在任富藏品中拥有学者和博士研究人员想要的：考古证明中国茶文化如何在日常生活中最基本的方式发展。是的，女士们，先生们，我们在任富收藏的巨大考古宝库中，发现了前道光时期两种不同的饮茶方式：一种是移动式功夫茶，一种是家用自做工夫茶。（在现代比较中想象笨重的家庭固定电话和小型手机一样）。是的，在任富收藏的巨大考古宝库中，我们发现了现实生活中使用过的燃烧器，我们将其归类为中型燃烧器（见二手中型燃烧器和木炭燃烧器的图片），用于移动工夫茶和大型燃烧器在家泡茶。（比较一下茶馆里巨大的燃烧器或炉子上的水锅）。
GONG FU TEA AND THE DRAGON OF TEAPOTS, THE SMALL MENG CHEN ZHUNI HU, HAVE RISEN FROM THE ASHES…………………………………
In a Summary of Proposal, submitted by world renowned scholar Professor Dr.Jean DeBernardi, who was seeking further funding for her research on the revival of tea culture and tea arts in contemporary China, said China is embarking on a global-wide soft power campaign to spread Chinese tea culture and tea arts to the world through commerce, education, museum exhibits, invented rituals, and the global network of Confucius Institutes.(Professor Dr. Jean DeBernardi has previously been funded by Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, University of Alberta, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation and others) In fact in a quest to improve its image abroad, more than 300 Confucius Institutes have been opened to make its cultural achievements known abroad. But in Chinese tea culture, so far the only cultural achievement made was in 2011 when UNESCO added the craftsmanship of making Chinese oolong tea to its intangible World Cultural Heritage which is the Wuyi Dahong Pao oolong tea and in the UNESCO website now displays an eight minutes documentary that proclaims oolong tea to be the epitome of Chinese tea culture, boasting that its quality is “the best the world had to offer”. But why did she mentioned “invented rituals” in China’s promotion of tea culture among the others which are commerce, education, museum exhibits and the global network of Confucius Institutes? Now what she said later in her research may explain why: Tea rituals were recent inventions like for example the mythic history of Dahong Pao associates this tea with the Tianxin Zen Temple and considered it Zen Buddhist tea. Although Japanese Buddhists transmitted this form of Buddhism from China to Japan, in China comparable tea ceremonies appear to be recent inventions influenced by contact with Japan. And individuals associated with the Lu Yu Tea Institute in Taipei, Taiwan, which is associated with the Ten Ren tea company , created one of the most popular of these modern invented rituals. There are a lot more on what was written about Chinese tea culture in which the best and most important is its tea ritual or ceremony but sadly there is none except for tea rituals borrowed from Japan and invented by Taiwanese who have nothing to do with China’s greatest tea ritual or ceremony or even Cha Dao whatever you want to call GONG FU TEA, the greatest tea culture in the world and still is, if only the panel of international scholars or PHD researchers have the archaeological proofs. And it makes us Ren Fu Collection so sad when we read this research report by a renowned European scholar who was paid by Tian Fu College, Zhangzhou, Ten Ren Tea company Taiwan and others to write “nothing” about the great Chinese tea culture because the real and greatest tea culture in the world, Gong Fu Tea, was missing and in its place are borrowed Japanese tea ritual and recent Taiwanese invented tea rituals. Yes, where is Gong Fu Tea, the great tea culture every Chinese in Pre-Daoguang times idolized, loved and practiced….and where are the Gong Fu tea wares which not only the Pre-Daoguang Chinese treasured but which the European Emperor Augustus the Strong craved for and also sparked off a Chinoiserie craze in Europe during Qian Long’s reign and most of all where is the Dragon of teapots, the legendary Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot that even the Dragon Emperor Qian Long approved and cherished by giving His Royal Consent to the production of the commemoration Meng Chen Qian Long 8th year reign Zhuni Pots and the Meng Chen Qian Long 13rd year reign Zhuni Pots. Surely such momentous events in Chinese tea culture history cannot just disappear from the surface of the Earth which will be a great loss to UNESCO the world body representing the intangible world cultural heritage.
Yes, we have heard about the mythical Emperor Shennong who discovered tea, and yes, we have heard about Lu Yu, the tea sage, who wrote the “Classic of Tea” a thousand times but where is Gong Fu Tea, the greatest tea culture in the world which the Chinese are always talking about but have no proofs, documented or archaeological. And UNESCO cannot put Gong Fu Tea in its List of Intangible World Cultural Heritage without any proofs. Yes, no documented or archaeological proofs. Why? Because the only great archaeological site in ZhangPuxian County every cultural relics pertaining to Early Qing Gong Fu Tea especially Early Kangxi Gong Fu Tea, have been plundered, looted and destroyed by Fujian tomb raiders hired by Taiwanese bosses especially the notorious Li Brothers. Yes, there was never a greater act of destruction of China National treasures since the sacking, burning, plundering and looting of the Summer Palace as encapsulated in the tomb raiders’ policy of “ Grab and Smash” where only the Zisha Pots and good porcelains were taken and the rest thrown away.( including the other precious Gong Fu tea wares and other cultural relics). And apart from that, we know there were two wars which posed an existential threat to Gong Fu Tea, that were the NanMing wars and the Opium wars. It is a great sacrilege and a great shame to China who had the greatest tea culture of all times, namely Gong Fu Tea, snatched away from it and now has to kowtow and borrow from the Japanese and Taiwanese, in order to have a “contemporary Chinese tea culture”……a very sad day for China!
Or is it?
No, definitely not, we are proud Chinese and have our own tea culture, in fact the greatest in the world, and we do not have to borrow from the Japanese or like in the words of Professor Jean DeBernardi, borrowed from the Taiwanese’s recent inventions or invented rituals that did not exist in the real Early Qing Gong Fu Tea.
Ladies and Gentlemen, we Ren Fu Collection, on behalf of Pre-Daoguang Chinese tea culture and the intangible world cultural heritage, shall help put Gong Fu Tea in UNESCO list of Intangible World Cultural Heritage.( it will take some time because PHD scholars in the top study and research world still do not know Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove existed)
P/s.For the whole Dr. Jean DeBernardi story please refer to https://www.academia.edu/38462250/Dr. Jean DeBernardi IG
Ren Fu Collection is considering setting up a joint working committee with a very famous Wuyi tea company with the aim of creating the old tea art form called Gong Fu Tea based on truth and archaeological material, facts and discoveries. And separately, either in Jakarta or Kuala Lumpurr, depending on circumstances like resurgence of deadly Covet+19 disease, we are toying with the idea of opening a Gong Fu tea art and Cha Dao with a small Gong Fu tea wares museum attached?
功夫茶与茶壶之龙，小孟臣朱泥壶，已从灰烬中重生……………………………………
世界著名学者Jean DeBernardi博士正在为其关于当代中国茶文化和茶艺术复兴的研究寻求进一步资助。她在提交的一份提案摘要中说，中国正在开展一场全球范围的软实力运动，通过商业、教育、博物馆展览、发明的仪式、文化和艺术向世界传播中国茶文化与茶艺术，以及孔子学院全球网络。（Jean DeBernardi教授和博士此前曾得到加拿大社会科学和人文研究委员会、阿尔伯塔大学、中国社会科学院、蒋经国基金会等机构的资助）事实上，为了改善孔子学院在国外的形象，已经开设了300多所孔子学院，以使其文化成就在国外广为人知。但在中国茶文化方面，迄今为止唯一取得的文化成就是在2011年，联合国教科文组织将制作中国乌龙茶的工艺添加到其非物质世界文化遗产武夷大红袍乌龙茶中，并在教科文组织网站上展示了一部八分钟的纪录片，宣称乌龙茶是中国茶文化的缩影，夸耀其质量是“世界上最好的”。但她为什么在中国推广茶文化的过程中提到“发明的仪式”，包括商业、教育、博物馆展览和孔子学院的全球网络？现在，她后来在研究中所说的可能解释了原因：茶仪式是最近的发明，例如大红袍的神话历史将这种茶与天心禅寺联系起来，并将其视为禅宗茶。虽然日本佛教徒将这种形式的佛教从中国传播到日本，但在中国，类似的茶道似乎是受与日本接触影响的最新发明。与台湾台北陆羽茶学院（Ten Ren Tea company）有关联的个人创造了这些现代发明仪式中最受欢迎的一种。关于中国茶文化的记载有很多，其中最好、最重要的是茶道或仪式，但遗憾的是，除了从日本借来、由台湾人发明的茶道之外，没有其他茶道，这些茶道与中国最伟大的茶道或茶道无关，甚至与你想称之为功夫茶的茶道无关，世界上最伟大的茶文化，如果国际学者或博士研究人员小组有考古证据的话，它仍然是。当我们读到一位著名的欧洲学者的研究报告时，这让我们感到非常悲伤。该研究报告是由漳州天福学院、台湾天仁茶叶公司和其他人资助的，他对伟大的中国茶文化“一无所知”，因为世界上真正伟大的茶文化，功夫茶，它缺失了，取而代之的是借用的日本茶道和最近台湾人发明的茶道。是的，功夫茶在哪里？功夫茶是道光之前每个中国人崇拜、喜爱和实践的伟大茶文化…。不仅道光之前的中国人珍视，而且欧洲皇帝奥古斯都强烈渴望并在乾隆统治期间在欧洲掀起中国风的功夫茶具在哪里？最重要的是，茶壶之龙在哪里，传说中的小孟臣朱泥壶，连龙帝乾隆都同意生产纪念孟臣乾隆八年朱泥壶和孟臣乾隆十三年朱泥壶，从而批准并珍藏了该壶。毫无疑问，中国茶文化史上的这些重大事件不会从地球表面消失，这将是代表世界非物质文化遗产的联合国教科文组织的巨大损失。
是的，我们听说过神话中的神农皇帝发现了茶，我们听说了茶圣人陆羽，他写了一千遍《茶经》，但功夫茶在哪里呢？功夫茶是世界上最伟大的茶文化，中国人一直在谈论，但没有证据、文献或考古证据。联合国教科文组织不能在没有任何证据的情况下将功夫茶列入其世界非物质文化遗产名录。是的，没有记录或考古证据。为什么？由于漳浦县唯一的大型考古遗址，清初功夫茶特别是康熙早期功夫茶的所有文物都被台湾老板特别是臭名昭著的李氏兄弟雇佣的福建盗墓者掠夺、洗劫和摧毁。是的，自从洗劫、焚烧、掠夺和抢劫颐和园以来，中国国宝遭到了前所未有的破坏。正如古墓丽影的“抢砸”政策所体现的那样，只有紫砂壶和精美瓷器被拿走，其余的都被扔掉了。（包括其他珍贵的功夫茶具等文物）。除此之外，我们知道有两场战争对功夫茶构成了生存威胁，那就是南明战争和鸦片战争。这是对中国的极大亵渎和耻辱，中国有史以来最伟大的茶文化，即功夫茶，被抢走了，现在不得不向日本人和台湾人磕头和借钱，以拥有“当代中国茶文化”……对中国来说是一个非常悲伤的日子！
还是这样？
不，绝对不是，我们是自豪的中国人，我们有自己的茶文化，事实上是世界上最伟大的茶文化。我们不需要借用日本人的话，也不需要借用Jean Debernadi教授的话，借用台湾人最近的发明或发明的仪式，而这些发明或仪式在真正的清初功夫茶中并不存在。
女士们，先生们，我们任富收藏将代表道光之前的中国茶文化和世界非物质文化遗产，帮助将功夫茶列入联合国教科文组织世界非物质遗产名录。（这需要一段时间，因为顶尖研究领域的博士学者仍然不知道任富收藏的巨大考古宝藏是否存在。）
P/s。有关Jean DeBernardi博士的整个故事，请参阅https://www.academia.edu/38462250/Dr.Jean DeBernardi IG
任富收藏正在考虑与一家非常著名的武夷茶叶公司成立一个联合工作委员会，目的是根据真相和考古材料、事实和发现，创造一种古老的茶艺术形式，称为功夫茶。另外，无论是在雅加达还是吉隆坡，根据致命的贪心新冠肺炎疾病的死灰复燃等情况，我们是否在考虑开设一个功夫茶艺馆和一个附带小功夫茶具博物馆的茶道？
A DOCUMENTARY FILM ABOUT HUI MENG CHEN! THE SMALL MENG CHEN ZHUNI POT AND GONG FU TEA…………………………………………
Tan Du, the famous composer who composed film scores for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon(2000), and Hero(2002) wrote an opera titled: Tea: A Mirror of the Soul. His opera was performed in Japan, the United States, the Netherlands and other countries.Professor Wang Xu Feng wrote and won the Mao Dun Literature Prize in 2000 for her book, Trilogies of Teamen. In 2011 she wrote a play about Lu Yu and worked with Hanban to develop a tea culture for the Confucius Institutes. Zhang Yi Mou scripted and choreographed a nightly open-air performance at Wuyi Mountain called Impression Dahong Pao which is about Wuyi Mountains most famous variety of oolong tea. It is a fact that people would be surprised to learn that the only recognition of Chinese tea culture by UNESCO is Daohong Pao as an Intangible World Heritage and or that a gold container filled with rare Dahong Pao had been deposited in China’s National Museum. And of course there was a film made about Gu Zing Zhou.
And yes, we know what you are going to say: what about a film or documentary about Hui Meng Chen, the Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot and Gong Fu Tea based on Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove of Gong Fu tea wares and Meng Chen Zhuni Pots? Yes, we believe a documentary is inevitable and maybe a movie about the greatest Potter of all times who inspired a renaissance in Chinese tea culture, namely, Gong Fu Tea.
We also now know from Ren Fu Collection’s huge archaeological trove that in Early Qing, starting from Kangxi reign and ending in Qian Long, Gong Fu Tea was the epitome of China’s greatest soft power.
In the history of Yixing teapots and Chinese tea culture, no potter had exerted so profound an influence as Hui Meng Chen. If Shi DaBin influenced Late Ming Zisha potting, then Hui Meng Chen influenced Zhuni Potting and Chinese tea culture in Early Qing. In fact, no Potter in the world, contemporary or old, has exerted such colossal influence as proven by the ubiquitous sea-salvaged Meng Chen Zisha Pots, the unearthed Meng Chen Yixing teapots and excavated Meng Chen Zhuni Pots with archaeological records found in Ren Fu Collection.
一部关于《惠孟臣》的纪录片！小孟臣朱泥壶和功茶…………………………………………
著名作曲家谭渡曾为《卧虎藏龙》（2000年）和《英雄》（2002年）创作了电影配乐，他写了一部歌剧《茶：心魂的镜子》。他的歌剧在日本、美国、荷兰和其他国家演出。2000年，王旭峰教授以其著作《铁门三部曲》获得茅盾文学奖。2011年，她写了一部关于鲁豫的戏剧，并与国家汉办合作，为孔子学院发展茶文化。张艺谋在武夷山为一场名为《印象大红袍》的夜间露天表演编剧和编舞，该表演讲述了武夷山最著名的乌龙茶品种。事实上，当人们得知联合国教科文组织唯一认可中国茶文化的是作为非物质世界遗产的大红袍，或者一个装满稀有大红袍的黄金容器被存放在中国国家博物馆时，他们会感到惊讶。当然，还有一部关于《顾景舟》的电影。
是的，我们知道你要说什么：关于惠孟臣、小孟臣朱泥壶和功夫茶的电影或纪录片怎么样？该片或纪录片是基于任富收藏的大量功夫茶具和孟臣款朱泥壶的考古宝藏？是的，我们相信纪录片是不可避免的，也许是一部关于有史以来最伟大的陶艺家的电影，他激发了中国茶文化的复兴，即功夫茶。
我们现在还从任富收藏的巨大考古宝藏中了解到，在清初，从康熙开始，到乾隆结束，功夫茶是中国最大的软实力的缩影。
在宜兴茶壶和中国茶文化的历史上，没有一位陶艺家像惠孟臣那样影响深远。如果说时大彬影响了晚明紫砂陶艺，那么惠孟臣则影响了清初的朱泥陶艺和中国茶文化。事实上，世界上没有任何一位陶艺家，无论是现代陶艺家还是古代陶艺家，能够产生如此巨大的影响力收藏。这一点可以从无处不在的海上打捞的孟臣紫砂壶、出土的孟臣宜兴茶壶和考古出土的孟臣朱泥壶中得到证明，这些壶都有任富收藏中发现的考古记录。
THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES OF THE REVOLUTIONARY SMALL MENG CHEN ZHUNI POT AND GONG FU TEA WILL NOT ONLY HELP PUT GONG FU TEA ON UNESCO’S LIST OF INTANGIBLE WORLD CULTURAL HERITAGE BUT HELP TO PROTECT THE LEGENDARY SMALL MENG CHEN ZHUNI POT, GONG FU TEA AND MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL, SAVE OLD ZISHA HUS……………………………………………..
Old Bad News: In 2011 when we were doing a fact-finding tour of Taiwan, the place with the biggest store of unearthed Pots, we met the most well-known Taiwanese scholar Huang Qian Liang whom we were told write a lot, a lot of books about Old Zisha Pots, in fact a prolific writer who used archaeological excavations to ‘convince’ his readers that all the Zisha Pots in his book are genuine Old Pots like the archaeologically excavated Zisha Pots he borrowed from authentic sources like state-museums in mainland China. But the most shocking thing was what Huang Qian Liang later said to Tony Ren when Tony Ren asked him if he was interested in a lot of archaeological material, data and discoveries belonging to Ren Fu Collection for his books, shocked not only Tony Ren but the learning world: I( Huang Qian Liang) am not interested in your archaeological material, data or discoveries, I am only interested in the Pots you want to sell?
Of course, we also found out later that the books he was writing are “Conversion Books” whereby he used archaeologically excavated Pots and other people’s genuine Old Pots to convert the Fake Pots in his books to genuine Old Pots.( we now know the notorious Taiwanese organized fraudster Peng Qing Fu was behind most of Huang Qian Liang’s Fake Pots)
Recent Bad News: We have been told quite a while ago that Liu Chuan Sin has appointed himself an overnight Chen Ming Yuan historian and became a devoted researcher of Chen Ming Yuan’s works. And we now know, Liu Chuan Sin became a Chen Ming Yuan researcher in order to convince people he is a true scholar and deal only in genuine Chen Ming Yuan Pots, but of course we know it’s not true why he took such great interest and suddenly became a ‘PHD’ researcher into Chen Ming Yuan’s works. The real reason is that there are a lot, a lot of big money waiting to be made from good Fake Chen Ming Yuan Pots in the market. Like when Liu Chuan Sin first started dealing in fake Rolex watches and then graduated to selling fake Zhang Da Qian’s paintings by pretending to learn painting from a master. Of course everyone knows this old news of Liu Chuan Sin dealing in fake Zhang DaQian’s paintings.
Latest Bad News: Talking about organized fraudsters, sometime the person selling Fake Zisha Pots is the victim of fraud and not the culprit . Take for example the latest hot gossips on-line, which we were informed, that Ma Wei Du is dealing in Fake Zisha Pots which he did not even know are Fake Pots because Mai Wei Du has been taught by organized fraudsters who have penetrated legitimate institutions museums, auction houses and now even victimized Ma Wei Du an innocent learner who is risking damage to his reputation in so doing. Nevertheless, the shocking news notwithstanding, it was the poignant and profound words of a Chinese Zisha Hu netizen in that on-line discourse that alarmingly sums up everything: “ If such an influential and famous Arts personality like Ma Wei Du can fall victim to organized frauds and ‘joined’ them in dealing in Fake Pots, then what hope has Old Zisha Hu got. Old Zisha Hu is finished, doomed to destruction and its days are numbered unless a very strong and trusted voice can fight this cancer.”
Ladies and Gentlemen, the stakes are too high now that only “people power” can save Old Zisha Hus because you cannot depend on the Taiwanese who have the most unearthed Pots because almost all of them deal in Fake Zisha Pots, almost all of Taiwanese used their unearthed Pots to make fake copies to deceive people especially mainland Chinese, almost all of the Zisha Hus books written by Taiwanese contain Fake Pots we called “conversion books”, and we cannot depend on the famous scholars like Huang Qian Liang who does research for the Palace Museum of Taiwan and who should be honest, responsible and truthful but instead abuse his position to cheat, deceive and defraud people who trusted him and now we cannot depend on Ma Wei Du who is a honest, respectable and honorable famous Arts T.V. personality because he is influenced and taught by organized fraudsters who have infiltrated institutions like auction houses and museums.
And not just the thousands of organized and small-time fraudsters who are destroying Old Zisha Hus with their Fake Pots and fake facts because now Fake Zisha Pots and fake chajins are destroying the real Gong Fu Tea by using inferior and toxic Fake Zisha Pots and cooking up fake tea rituals to destroy the real Gong Fu Tea.
Do not fear these thousands of organized and small-time fraudsters because there are many, many times more good, honest people in the world. What we need to do are to stand up to them because that’s the only way to save Old Zisha Hus and Gong Fu Tea.
And we will tell you how we, the good people of the world, are going to do to save Old Zisha Hus and Gong Fu Tea?
- You good people go out and tell anybody and everybody about Ren Fu Collection battle to fight thousands of fraudsters to save Old Zisha Hus and Gong Fu Tea.
- You good people go out and search for Fake Zisha Pots and inform us by giving the pictures of the Fake Zisha Pots and the people who own the Fake Pots so that we can put the Fake Zisha Pots in Ren Fu Collection’s Black-List of Fake Pots which will become a database for potential buyers to search to make sure any Pot/s they are buying is/are genuine Old. We will create or open a “Donation Box” for Fake Pots informers and any information and informant will be guarded with strict confidentiality.
- You good people of the world will sign up on Ren Fu Collection’s Petition to Ask Palace Museum of Taiwan to Replace Huang Qian Liang .(using org)
- Failing that, if it ever happens, we will eventually start a Petition to Appeal to the Chinese top leaders to help save Old Zisha Hus and Gong Fu Tea, China’s greatest tea culture from these existential threats.
- On our part, we will inform the universities professors and museum and PHD researchers by sending Ren Fu Collection’s book, “Saving Old Purple-Sand Clay Teapots”, accompanied by a letter from the Malaysian Ambassador to the United States Dato Azmil Zabidi, a letter from Tony Ren and 28 pages of archaeological discoveries of Hui Meng Chen, the Small Meng Chen Zhuni Pot and Gong Fu Tea, with emphasis on the existential threat posed by organized frauds and Fake Zisha Pots.(note: the Ambassador’s letter would appeal to accredited professors for help to save Old Zisha Hus)
- Two most powerful and most influential international newspapers will be informed: the Financial Times whose motto “Without Fear or Without Favour” and The New York Times whose previous article in 2005, “ Forging an Art Market in China” will be followed up with our “Saving Old Yixing Teapots and Gong Fu Tea” when we send our book to them with the Malaysian Ambassador’s letter and Tony Ren’s letter.
P/s…We are hoping to change Ren Fu Collection’s Black-List of Fake Zisha Pots to another name: The People’s Black-List of Fake Zisha Hus. And we are working out a way to reward good people who inform us on organized fraudsters and Fake Zisha Pots by rewarding them with our e-book or giving them invitation cards to Ren Fu Collection’s exclusive exhibition where they can rub shoulders with famous historians, professors, PHD researchers of universities, Ambassadors of foreign countries, etc..
革命性小孟臣朱泥壶和功夫茶的考古发现不仅有助于将功夫茶列入联合国教科文组织的非物质世界文化遗产名录，而且有助于保护传说中的小孟臣朱泥壶、功夫茶，最重要的是，拯救古老的紫砂壶……………………………………………。。
旧的坏消息：2011年，当我们在台湾这个出土陶器最多的地方进行实地考察时，我们遇到了最著名的台湾学者黄健亮，他们告诉我们写了很多关于紫砂壶的书，事实上，他是一位多产的作家，利用考古发掘来“说服”他的读者，他书中的所有紫砂壶都是真正的旧壶，就像他从中国大陆国家博物馆等真实来源借来的考古发掘的紫砂壶一样。但最令人震惊的是，当任汤尼问他是否对任富收藏中的许多考古材料、数据和发现感兴趣时，黄健亮后来对任汤尼说的话，不仅震惊了任汤尼，也震惊了学习界：“我（黄健亮）对你的考古材料、数据或发现不感兴趣，我只对你想卖的老壶感兴趣？”
当然，我们后来还发现，他写的书是“转化书”，他用考古发掘的紫砂壶和其他人的真旧壶将书中的假老壶转化为真老壶。（我们现在知道，臭名昭著的台湾有组织诈骗犯彭清福是黄健亮大部分假壶的幕后黑手。）
最近的坏消息是：我们早就听说刘创新一夜之间成为了陈鸣远的历史学家，并成为了陈鸣远作品的忠实研究者。我们现在知道，刘创新成为陈鸣远研究员是为了让人们相信他是一个真正的学者，只经营真正的陈鸣远紫砂壶，但我们当然知道，他为什么对陈鸣远的作品如此感兴趣，突然成为一名“博士”研究员，这是不真实的。真正的原因是，市场上有很多很多高工艺假冒的陈鸣远款壶中赚到大钱。比如刘创新第一次开始经营假劳力士手表，然后通过假装向大师学习绘画而毕业销售假张大千的画。当然，大家都知道刘创新经营假张大千画的是老消息。
最新的坏消息：谈到有组织的欺诈者，有时出售假紫砂壶的人是欺诈的受害者，而不是罪魁祸首。例如，我们获悉的最新网上热门八卦，马未都在线上经营的是假紫砂壶，他甚至不知道这是假壶，因为马未都受到了有组织的骗子的教育，他们渗透到合法机构、博物馆、拍卖行，现在甚至伤害了马未都——一个无辜的学习者，他这样做可能会损害自己的声誉。然而，尽管有令人震惊的消息，这是一位中国紫砂壶网友在那篇在线言论中的尖锐而深刻的话语，令人震惊地总结了一切：“如果像马未都这样有影响力和知名的艺术人物能够成为有组织欺诈的受害者，并“加入”他们的假壶交易，那么老紫砂壶又有什么希望呢？老紫砂壶已经完蛋了，注定要毁灭，它的日子屈指可数，除非有一个非常强大和可信的声音能够战胜这种癌症。”
女士们，先生们，现在的赌注太高了，只有呼唤“人民力量”才能拯救老紫砂壶，因为你不能依赖拥有最多出土的紫砂壶的台湾人，因为他们几乎都经营假的老紫砂壶，几乎所有台湾人都用他们出土的老壶制作假复制品来欺骗人们，尤其是中国大陆人，几乎所有台湾人写的紫砂壶书籍都含有我们称之为“转化书”的假壶，我们不能依赖像黄健亮这样的著名学者，他为台湾故宫博物院做研究，应该诚实、负责、诚实，但却滥用自己的地位进行欺骗，欺骗和欺骗信任他的人，现在我们不能依靠马未都，他是一位诚实、受人尊敬和值得尊敬的著名艺术收藏电视人物，因为他受到有组织的骗子的影响和教育，这些骗子渗透到拍卖行和博物馆等机构。
不仅仅是成千上万有组织的小骗子用他们的假茶壶和假事实毁掉了老紫砂壶，因为现在假紫砂壶和假茶壶正在毁掉真正的功夫茶，他们使用劣质有毒的假紫砂壶，并通过伪造茶道来毁掉真正的功夫茶。
不要害怕这些成千上万的有组织的小骗子，因为世界上善良诚实的人要多得多。我们需要做的是勇敢地对抗他们，因为这是拯救老紫砂壶和功夫茶的唯一方法。
我们会告诉你，我们这些世界上的好人，将如何拯救老紫砂壶和功夫茶？
1）你们好人出去告诉任何人和每个人关于任富收藏的战斗，以对抗成千上万的骗子，以拯救老紫砂壶和功夫茶。
2) 各位好心人出去搜一下假紫砂壶，把假紫砂壶的照片和拥有者的照片告诉我们，这样我们就可以把假紫砂壶列入任富收藏的黑名单假老壶将成为潜在买家搜索的数据库，以确保他们购买的任何 壶是真正的旧的。我们将为假壶告密者创建或打开一个“捐款箱”，任何信息和告密者都将受到严格保密。
3) 天下好心人报名任富收藏请愿书，请台湾故宫博物院更换黄健亮。（使用change.org）
4）做不到这一点，如果发生这种情况，我们最终将发起请愿书，呼吁中国最高领导人帮助拯救中国最伟大的茶文化老紫砂壶和功夫茶免受这些生存威胁。
5) 我们将向大学教授、博物馆和博士研究人员发送任富收藏的著作《拯救老紫砂泥茶壶》，并附上马来西亚驻美国大使拿督阿兹米尔扎比迪的来信， 任汤尼的一封信和 28 页的惠孟臣、小孟臣朱泥壶和功夫茶的考古发现，强调有组织的诈骗和假紫砂壶所带来的生存威胁。（注：大使的信将上诉向认可的教授寻求帮助以拯救老紫砂壶）
6) 将通知两家最有影响力和影响力的国际报纸：以“无所畏惧、无偏袒”为座右铭的英国《金融时报》和《纽约时报》 2005 年的上一篇文章“打造中国艺术市场”将跟进我们的“拯救旧宜兴茶壶和功夫茶”，当我们将书籍连同马来西亚大使的信和任汤尼的信寄给他们时。
P/s：我们希望把任富收藏的假紫砂壶黑名单改成另一个名字：人民的假紫砂壶黑名单。我们正在研究一种方法来奖励那些向我们通报有组织的欺诈者和假紫砂壶的好人，通过我们的电子书奖励他们或给他们邀请卡参加任富收藏的独家展览，在那里他们可以与著名的历史学家、教授擦肩而过, 大学博士研究人员, 驻外大使等。
